From 'Six in the Fifth Place: Adorning the hills and gardens' to 'In the end, good fortune.' The Proper Meaning states: 'Adorning the hills and gardens'—hills and gardens are places of plain simplicity.
Six in the Fifth Place 'occupies the honored position and is the master of adornment.' If it can apply adornment to places of plain simplicity without wasteful luxury, then the bundles of silk will be 'meager and modest' in expenditure.
'Humiliation, in the end good fortune'—its initial frugality seems 'stingy and sparing.' Yet only through the 'frugality' of restraint does one attain 'good fortune in the end' and have cause for joy; hence the Image says, 'The good fortune of Six in the Fifth Place brings joy.'
On the commentary: 'Dwelling in the honored position' to 'only then can one attain good fortune in the end.' The Proper Meaning states: 'The master of adornment, the height of embellishment'—as with palaces, carriages, and robes, the fifth line is the master of adornment.
If one applies embellishment to carriages, robes, and palace halls, the Great Way will be damaged. 'Applying adornment to hills and gardens, nothing is greater than this'—a hill means an earthen mound; a garden means an orchard.
Only where grass and trees grow is a place of natural simplicity, not of opulent luxury. If one can practice adornment such that every matter remains simple like hills and gardens, nothing could be greater.
Therefore, 'If one adorns with bundles of silk, hills and gardens decay'—bundles of silk mean wealth and goods; mentioning bundles of silk encompasses gold, silver, pearls, and jade.
If one adorns with these bundles of silk and precious treasures, the Way of plain simplicity will wither and fall; hence it is said, 'hills and gardens decay.'
'If one adorns the hills and gardens, the silk is meager and modest' means that if embellishment is directed toward the simplicity of hills and gardens, wealth will not be squandered, and bundles of silk will remain modest and unspent.
Various scholars take this to mean: if one expends bundles of silk on luxuries instead of recruiting worthy scholars, then the hermits in hills and gardens will decline; but if one decorates the scholars of hills and gardens by giving them gifts, then the rolls of silk are meager.
Most commentaries adopt this explanation. However, Wang Bi's commentary shows no intention of referring to recruiting worthies, nor do the line and Image contain words about honoring scholars.
Wang Bi states: 'In expenditure nothing surpasses frugality; to remain restrained amid prosperity requires being sparing, and only then can one attain good fortune in the end.' This broadly discusses the governance of a state, disdaining wasteful luxury and valuing frugality.
If one followed the earlier masters in saying that bundles of silk are used solely to recruit scholars from the hills and gardens, how could treating worthies with frugality be the meaning?
When the Han dynasty recruited hermits, they often used lambs, geese, dark-and-crimson silks, rush-wrapped wheels, and teams of four horses—how could it be limited to meager bundles of silk and termed a matter of stinginess?
Observing the intent of Wang Bi's commentary, this interpretation is therefore adopted.